·  No. 1 Every claim graded  ·  No advertising  ·  Corrections published in place
Vero Record

Reporting and documentary investigation from Nigeria. What the paper says, and what it does not.

Long-form documentary investigation

The Dossiers

A dossier is not a news story. It is a numbered evidentiary file, built only from records a reader can retrieve, in which every proposition carries the grade of the evidence behind it, every correction stays on the page where the original claim stood, and the list of documents we could not obtain is printed alongside the ones we did.

The three files

  1. 01TinubuPublished
  2. 02ObiIn preparation
  3. 03AtikuIn preparation

Free to download. No registration, no advertising, and nothing recorded about who reads them.

Three files open · one published · none of them takes a side, and the choice of all three is the reason we can say so
01 The cover of The Tinubu Files, reading: a documentary record of what was investigated and what was never decided, 1988 to 2026 Published

Fifty-eight supplements
Federal · 1988 to 2026

Tinubu

What was investigated, what was settled without admission, and what was never decided by any court. Assembled from United States federal court records, Nigerian corporate and electoral registers, United Kingdom company filings, national audit reports and the archived versions of an official biography.

Read all 487 pages What the file claims

487 pages · 600 numbered findings
Readable in the page, 5.5 MB
183 graded claims
180 (A) · 66 (B) · 35 (C) 4 corrections published in place
02 Illustration: A padlock closed over a file In preparation
Opened
No findings published
State and offshore · 2006 to 2021

Obi

A narrow file on one question: an offshore incorporation reported by the Pandora Papers consortium in October 2021, and the asset declarations filed with the Code of Conduct Bureau that would show whether it was declared. The Constitution grants every citizen the right to inspect those declarations. No statute has ever been enacted to make that right usable.

What this file covers

Scope fixed, narrow by design
Two record worlds: an offshore register and a Nigerian declaration regime

Publishes when the declarations are obtained, refused in writing, or the refusal itself is documented

No claim is made here about whether anything was concealed
03 Illustration: Two separate documents overlapping, neither of them a judgment In preparation
Opened
No findings published
Cross-border · 2000 to 2010

Atiku

A United States Senate subcommittee published a case history in February 2010 describing transfers into American accounts. A civil complaint filed by the Securities and Exchange Commission in 2008 made a separate allegation. Both documents are public, both were denied, and no charge was ever brought in the United States. This file examines what those two documents establish and, at greater length, what they do not.

What this file covers

Scope fixed
Two public United States documents plus the responses on the record

Publishes when the underlying exhibits are located in a public docket, or when their absence is documented

No charge was brought. Nothing here asserts otherwise

What makes a dossier different from a report

(A) Primary record

A court file, an official register, a government filing, a statute, an audited account. Something we retrieved, and for which the exact query or docket number is printed so you can retrieve it too.

(B) Attributed statement

Someone identifiable said it, and that they said it is documented. Whether it is true is a separate question, and a dossier does not answer it under this grade.

(C) Inference

Our reasoning from the record above, including arithmetic we performed ourselves. Always printed with its inputs, and never dressed as anything else.

The four rules that decide what gets in

A finding must be retrievable by a stranger. It must be new, or newly connected. It must survive being argued against by someone trying to break it. And it must say plainly what it does not establish. A finding that fails any one of the four is dropped, however good it reads.

Why these three

Because a file on one of them alone would be a campaign document. The 2023 presidential election was contested principally by these three men, and each has a body of public record attached to him that has never been assembled in one place with its evidentiary weight marked.

We support none of them. Anyone with a documented record is eligible, and the order in which the files open is decided by which records are retrievable, not by who is currently in office.

What we will not do to get a document

We obtain no record whose acquisition would create an attributable transaction: no purchased filings, no certified extracts, no searches requested in our own name.

Where such a document would settle a question, we name it, name its custodian, print its price, and leave the question open with the inference stated. A reader who wants it closed can close it, and will owe us nothing for doing so.